Qualified professionals evaluate AI work in their own field.

A model can write convincingly and be wrong. Here its answer is judged by a professional from that field, against a visible, versioned rubric, and the decision is kept in a record you can check. The path below shows how an evaluator qualifies: learning, assessment and qualification are separate steps.

The decision path

  1. 1

    Choose the professional programme

    Start with the profession and the work you need to improve. The programme page tells you who it is for, the order of its courses, its language, its limits and whether there is a route to qualification.
  2. 2

    Learn, practise and complete

    Work through professional scenarios, evidence checks and risk decisions. Completion shows the learning you have done; on its own it does not prove professional competence or authorisation.
  3. 3

    Choose assessment only where available

    A separate work sample is judged by people against the rubric and assessment policy in force. Critical professional failures cannot be averaged away. The assessor cannot be the person who directly prepared the candidate.
  4. 4

    Record the human decision

    The outcome keeps the evidence, the roles of the reviewers and the rule versions used.
Demo data. The evaluator scores each criterion and backs every score with evidence. A second evaluator co-signs, so no decision rests with one person. See every step under How it works.

A visible assessment rubric, with a version for each programme

The criteria below show the kinds of evidence a professional assessment may ask for. The rubric actually applied is specific to each programme, approved by professionals where required, versioned, and linked to every decision.

  1. 1

    Factual accuracy

    Is the statement true in the field, not merely plausible?
  2. 2

    Regulatory fit

    Does it comply with the Albanian rules and the EU rules that apply?
  3. 3

    Safety

    Would acting on it harm the patient, the client or the public?
  4. 4

    Source accuracy

    Is every citation real, current, and the one that governs?
  5. 5

    Reasoning

    Can they say why, in terms another professional would accept?
  6. 6

    Edge cases

    What they do when the case does not fit the pattern.
  7. 7

    Disclosure

    Whether assistance used is declared, fully and unprompted.
  8. 8

    Consistency

    Do they score the same case the same way a week later?

What an outcome means

A completed programme shows the learning done. A qualification shows that a human assessment met the rules in force for a defined field. It can make you eligible to be considered for work we manage. It never guarantees assignment, hours or income: being assigned work is a separate decision, made under contract.

Verified records
Demo data. The result is shown to the candidate on the course. The certificate is issued only after the evaluation. See every step under How it works.

The platform

  • No trackers and no telemetry on the learning platform.
  • Albanian first, built to extend to other European languages.

Two ways on from here

If you build AI, request an evaluated work sample. If you are a professional who wants to become an evaluator, start from your profession's programme.

Request a sampleStart from your profession